Hong Kong Court Refuses To Recognize Overseas Same-Sex Marriage
August 26, 2022A human rights activist has lost an appeal against a Hong Kong court’s refusal to recognize his New York-registered same-sex marriage.
On Wednesday, three appeal judges dismissed Jimmy Sham Tsz-kit’s argument that same-sex couples had the same right to marriage as heterosexual couples, as South China Morning Post reports.
The Court of Appeal ruled that the city’s constitution only granted access to the institution of marriage to opposite-sex partners [sic] and that the government had no obligation to recognize same-sex unions.
Successful legal challenges to discriminatory policies in recent years did not justify a “short-cut” to avoid constitutional restraints that denied LGBTQ+ people the right to marry in Hong Kong, the judges ruled.
Sham, currently in custody over subversion charges in connection with allegations that he took part in an unofficial legislative primary election in 2020, asked for a judicial review in 2018. He could not enjoy the same marital benefits as heterosexual couples, he said. Sham married in the US five years before the legal challenge was launched.
In 2019, the Court of First Instance rejected a challenge against the ban on same-sex marriages and civil partnerships, launched by a lesbian woman identified only as MK, but Sham was the first to take a case to the appeal court.
The Chief Judge of the High Court, Jeremy Poon Shiu-chor, said freedom of marriage was protected by Article 37 of the Basic Law, but that the clause specifically favored opposite-sex unions [sic]. He ruled that must take precedence over general provisions designed to protect fundamental rights, including Article 25 which guaranteed the right to equality.
“The Basic Law only prefers heterosexual marriage, which means that only heterosexual couples are entitled to recognition of their foreign marriage,” Poon wrote. “If the same recognition is afforded to same-sex couples married overseas, they would be able to circumvent the preference enshrined in Article 37, clearly contrary to the intention of the drafters of the Basic Law.”
Poon admitted there was “difficulty or even perceived hardship” for same-sex couples who married overseas who wanted to obtain marital benefits in Hong Kong by legal means, but insisted that did not mean they could bypass existing legal provisions to “access the institution of marriage.”
Hong Kong recognizes same-sex marriages for purposes such as taxation, inheritance rights, and civil service benefits. These concessions were achieved through legal action launched over the last few years. The Hong Kong government has yes to carry out a wider review of its policies on same-sex unions.
Read related myGwork articles here:
Trans Men Lose Legal Bid To Change Gender On Hong Kong ID Without Undergoing Full Surgery
Christian Pastor Fights for Right to Marry Same-Sex Partners in Hong Kong
Hong Kong Leader Dismisses Same Sex Marriage
Hong Kong Chief Executive Criticised for Ignoring LGBT+ Questions in Public Forum
Keep up to date with the latest myGnews